Browse By

Dear Take Shelter,

(Click here for Postcard Review)

A lot of movies thrive on ambiguity. From characters with questionable motives to the fluid, elusive nature of “the truth,” movies make a habit of using the concept of subjective perspective as a means of creating conflict and interest. However, most movies just live off the mystery, never seeking to explore the meaning behind it, or what that lack of clarity means to the world or characters at large.

You, though, exist as an exercise in trying to see how far this manipulation of tone and perspective can be taken as a means of emotional storytelling. Your story depends on the constant questioning of the sanity and actions of your main character, Curtis, but does not make that question the sole crutch of the story. Instead, you use it as a means of exploring a stranger, more elemental question regarding life, faith, and commitment. This narrative of uncertainty begins its life as a mystery before morphing into something much more deep, meaningful, and complex.

Curtis (Michael Shannon) is an Ohio sand miner, spending his days working hard in the dirt and the dust to make a life for him and his family. His wife Samantha (Jessica Chastain) sells hand-embroidered pillows and apparel on the weekends at a flea market to make enough money for the family’s yearly vacation to the beach. Their daughter is deaf, but may be eligible for a cochlear implant. Yet in spite of the hardships, their lives are full of love and happiness. Lately, however, Curtis has been plagued with nightmares involving an apocalyptic storm and mobs of raving, violent people.

Curtis at first simply wakes up startled and breathless, but as the visions become more violent they begin to affect his waking life. After dreaming about being attacked by his dog, Curtis fences the animal in the back yard. Then he notices the neglected storm shelter in his back yard, and starts to think about ways to improve it. The work distances him from his wife, who struggles to understand his changes in behavior.

The plot, as it stands, is not so different from the plot of many movies. It’s sort of a dark, twisted version of Field of Dreams, with the stakes being much higher and the possible backlash much more intense. Curtis’s mother developed paranoid schizophrenia when she was in her thirties, having to be put into an assisted living home. The fear of losing his family in the same way, of having to leave them behind as he descends into madness, locks Curtis into a cycle of solitary worry, lies, and half-truths.

What is different and interesting about the way you play this plot, though, is the manner in which Curtis’s mania toys with the audience’s allegiance. We begin the film on Curtis’s side, believing – as he believes – that the world is on the brink of destruction. There seems to be no other reason that a man would be so moved and disturbed by his dreams. When the idea is floated that he might be crazy we see this for what it is, the obvious reaction of a world that can’t see what he sees, and refuses to believe the one person who really knows what is going on. But as time goes on and Curtis allows his visions to ferment and his reclusive nature to consume him, we begin to grow concerned.

A true element of horror, which many films seem to be neglecting recently, is the fear of something bad happening to someone we empathize with. Curtis is such an earnest man, such a committed father and husband, that we fear both the possibility of the world’s end and the possibility of Curtis’s mental illness separating him from his family. You know that a movie is something special when you end up rooting for the end of the world, and that is exactly what happens here. The fear that Curtis is right is only eclipsed by the fear that he is wrong.

This is the kind of complexity and heart that many films today lack. The existential anguish of Curtis’s position, and by extension the audience’s sympathies, creates a moving, intense viewing experience. Curtis deserves vindication, deserves to be proven right or wrong, deserves to be with his wife and daughter. The slow, measured build up of tension and fear and concern is almost unbearable, and whichever terrible eventuality occurs, we know it is better than the uncertainty.

You do suffer from some sluggishness in your second act, but between the subtle, measured intricacies of your story and tone, and the skill of your actors – who create layered, empathetic characters – you are still well worth seeing. Your director, Jeff Nichols, evinces a skill and restraint that make me eager to see what else he is capable of.

With boundless admiration,

Brian J. Roan

5 thoughts on “Dear Take Shelter,”

  1. Pingback: Postcard Review – Take Shelter
  2. Trackback: Postcard Review – Take Shelter
  3. Ric says:

    Compelling character studies are such a lost art that this sounds undeniable and powerful. Almost like you would be a lesser fan of film to miss it! Thanks man.

  4. Dan Gvozden says:

    Are you asserting that the ending of this film is set in stone?

    “You know that a movie is something special when you end up rooting for the end of the world, and that is exactly what happens here.”

    I didn’t quite see it the same as you. I never really thought the apocalypse was coming or truly believed in Curtis as a prophet, though the idea was always there. So in this way the ending seemed more ambiguous to me. I guess it makes sense to take it as it appears, but could it be that his family has just finally begun to see what he sees maybe not so literally?

    1. Brian J. Roan says:

      I am uncertain about the finality or literal reality of the ending. The greater part of me thinks it is the final awful vindication of Curtis. At the same time, a small part of me feels it might be a general shift in perception of his family. Perhaps the reality of the situation that will face them has helped them to see what Curtis sees.

      The point I was making with the quote you cited, though, was that Curtis’s desire to be with his family, and his empathetic relationship with the audience, was strong enough to make me want him to be right, if only so he might not have to face the idea of having to leave them to live in the manner of his mother.

      Either way you look at it, the ambiguity and the lack of certainty regarding reality only lends itself even more strongly to the movie’s central theme, which is what is really spectacular about it.

  5. Pingback: Personal Best of 2011
  6. Trackback: Personal Best of 2011

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *